Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform.

Do anonymous online conversations between people with different political views exacerbate or mitigate partisan polarization? We created a mobile chat platform to study the impact of such discussions. Our study recruited Republicans and Democrats in the United States to complete a survey about their political views. We later randomized them into treatment conditions where they were offered financial incentives to use our platform to discuss a contentious policy issue with an opposing partisan. We found that people who engage in anonymous cross-party conversations about political topics exhibit substantial decreases in polarization compared with a placebo group that wrote an essay using the same conversation prompts. Moreover, these depolarizing effects were correlated with the civility of dialogue between study participants. Our findings demonstrate the potential for well-designed social media platforms to mitigate political polarization and underscore the need for a flexible platform for scientific research on social media.

Effectiveness and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is quite prevalent in clinical practice, but evidence of its effectiveness and safety compared with high-dose DOAC in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of low-dose and high-dose DOACs in patients with AF with similar baseline characteristics. METHODS: We used a cohort of hospitalized patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF after discharge to the community, whose data were stored in the Quebec administrative databases, from 2011 to 2017. Older adults with AF newly prescribed with rivaroxaban (15 or 20 mg) or apixaban (2.5 mg or 5 mg) were classified as under treatment (UT) and intent to treat (ITT). We used an inverse probability treatment weighting study of new users of rivaroxaban and apixaban to address confounding by indication. The primary effectiveness outcome was ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), while the primary safety outcome was major bleeding (MB). We used Cox proportional models to estimate the marginal hazard ratios (HRs). FINDINGS: A total of 1,722 and 4,639 patients used low-dose and standard-dose rivaroxaban, respectively, while 3,833 and 6,773 patients used low-dose and standard-dose apixaban, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of comparative stroke/SE and MB between low-dose and standard-dose rivaroxaban, except for the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which was increased with the low dose in the UT analysis. For apixaban, no difference was found in the bleeding rates, but the risk of stroke/SE (HR: 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-2.76) and death (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.46-2.70) were greater in the low-dose group than in the standard-dose group in the UT analysis. Similar results were observed for the ITT analysis. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in the effectiveness or safety outcome between low-dose and standard-dose rivaroxaban, except for AMI. However, low-dose apixaban was associated with a greater risk of stroke/SE and death without a reduction in the bleeding rates.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of high-dose rivaroxaban and apixaban for atrial fibrillation: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Observational studies assessing direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) dosage in atrial fibrillation (AF) reported that a lower proportion of patients received high-dose DOACs compared to those in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Effectiveness and safety of high-dose DOACs relative to apixaban in a real-world AF population need to be addressed. The aim is to assess comparative effectiveness and safety of high-dose rivaroxaban relative to apixaban. DESIGN: We conducted a cohort study. Setting We built a cohort of patients hospitalized and discharged in community with a primary or secondary AF diagnosis from 2011-2017 using Quebec administrative databases (Med-Echo and RAMQ). Patients Cohort entry was defined as the first OAC claim in new users of high-dose rivaroxaban and apixaban, with no OAC claims in the prior year. Intervention To compare effectiveness and safety of high-dose rivaroxaban to apixaban. Measurement We ascertained patient demographics, comorbidities, CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED scores and Charlson score within 3 years prior to cohort entry. Primary effectiveness and safety were a composite of ischemic stroke/systemic thrombosis, death, myocardial infarction, and of intracranial bleeding (ICH), extracranial major bleeding, in the first year following drug initiation. We conducted propensity score matching and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes using Cox proportional hazard models. All the analyses were conducted to account for competing risks. Main results The cohort consisted of 4,632 and 6,771 patients received high-dose rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. High-dose rivaroxaban users were younger with a mean age of 73.2 years, presented less associated comorbidities and had lower CHA2DS2-VASc scores compared to apixaban. High-dose rivaroxaban at the intention to treat was associated with a higher risk of stroke/SE/death (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.40) and worse composite effectiveness (HR 1.21: 1.05-1.40); under treatment exposure, those values were at HR (1.66: 1.21-2.29) and HR (1.58:1.19-2.10), respectively. And, rivaroxaban presented a less favorable safety profile relative to apixaban. Conclusion In this study, composite effectiveness and safety varied between rivaroxaban and apixaban. High-dose apixaban was observed to have a better effectiveness and safety.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Dose Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Aims: Observational studies of various dose levels of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) found that a high proportion of patients received a dose lower than the target dose tested in randomized controlled trials. There is a need to compare low-dose DOACs with warfarin or other DOACs on effectiveness and safety. Methods: Using administrative data from Quebec province, Canada, we built a cohort of new warfarin or DOAC users discharged from hospital between 2011 and 2017. We determined CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, and comorbidities for 3-year prior cohort entry. The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), and secondary outcomes included a safety composite of major bleeding (MB) events and effectiveness composite (stroke/SE, death) at 1-year follow-up. We contrasted each low-dose DOAC with warfarin or other DOACs as references using inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate marginal Cox hazard ratios (HRs). Results: The cohort comprised 22,969 patients (mean age: 80-86). We did not find a significant risk reduction for the stroke/SE primary effectiveness endpoint for DOACs vs. warfarin; however, we observed a significantly lower risk for low-dose dabigatran vs. warfarin (HR [95%CI]: 0.59 [0.42-0.81]) for effectiveness composite, mainly due to a lower death rate. The differences in effectiveness and safety composites between low-dose rivaroxaban vs. warfarin were not significant. However, low-dose apixaban had a better safety composite (HR: 0.68 [0.53-0.88]) vs. warfarin. Comparisons of dabigatran vs. apixaban showed a lower risk of stroke/SE (HR: 0.53 [0.30-0.93]) and a 2-fold higher risk of MB. The MB risk was higher for rivaroxaban than for apixaban (HR: 1.58 [1.09-2.29]). Conclusions: The results of this population-based study suggest that low-dose dabigatran has a better effective composite than warfarin. Compared with apixaban, low-dose dabigatran had a better effectiveness composite but a worse safety profile. Low-dose apixaban had a better safety composite than warfarin and other low-dose DOACs. Given that the comparative effectiveness and safety seem to vary from one DOAC to another, pharmacokinetic data for specific populations are now warranted.

Agreement Between Administrative Database and Medical Chart Review for the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease G category.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major health issue and cardiovascular risk factor. Validity assessment of administrative data for the detection of CKD in research for drug benefit and risk using real-world data is important. Existing algorithms have limitations and we need to develop new algorithms using administrative data, giving the importance of drug benefit/risk ratio in real world. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate a predictive algorithm for CKD GFR category 4-5 (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 but not receiving dialysis or CKD G4-5ND) using the administrative databases of the province of Quebec relative to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a reference standard. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study using chart collection and administrative databases. SETTING: The study was conducted in a community outpatient medical clinic and pre-dialysis outpatient clinic in downtown Montreal and rural area. PATIENTS: Patient medical files with at least 2 serum creatinine measures (up to 1 year apart) between September 1, 2013, and June 30, 2015, were reviewed consecutively (going back in time from the day we started the study). We excluded patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. The study was started in September 2013. MEASUREMENT: Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the CKD Epidemiological Collaboration (CKD-EPI) from each patient's file. Several algorithms were developed using 3 administrative databases with different combinations of physician claims (diagnostics and number of visits) and hospital discharge data in the 5 years prior to the cohort entry, as well as specific drug use and medical intervention in preparation for dialysis in the 2 years prior to the cohort entry. METHODS: Chart data were used to assess eGFR. The validity of various algorithms for detection of CKD groups was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: A total of 434 medical files were reviewed; mean age of patients was 74.2 ± 10.6 years, and 83% were older than 65 years. Sensitivity of algorithm #3 (diagnosis within 2-5 years and/or specific drug use within 2 years and nephrologist visit ≥4 within 2-5 years) in identification of CKD G4-5ND ranged from 82.5% to 89.0%, specificity from 97.1% to 98.9% with PPV and NPV ranging from 94.5% to 97.7% and 91.1% to 94.2%, respectively. The subsequent subgroup analysis (diabetes, hypertension, and <65 and ≥65 years) and also the comparisons of predicted prevalence in a cohort of older adults relative to published data emphasized the accuracy of our algorithm for patients with severe CKD (CKD G4-5ND). LIMITATIONS: Our cohort comprised mostly older adults, and results may not be generalizable to all adults. Participants with CKD without 2 serum creatinine measurements up to 1 year apart were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: The case definition of severe CKD G4-5ND derived from an algorithm using diagnosis code, drug use, and nephrologist visits from administrative databases is a valid algorithm compared with medical chart reviews in older adults.

CONTEXTE: L'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) est un problème de santé majeur et un facteur de risque cardiovasculaire. La validité de la détection de l'IRC à partir des bases de données administratives est importante pour les études évaluant en situation réelle les bénéfices et les risques des médicaments. Les algorithmes existants comportent des limites et, compte tenu de l'importance revêtue par ce rapport bénéfices/risques, le développement de nouveaux algorithmes utilisant les bases de données administratives s'avère essentiel. OBJECTIF: Valider le pouvoir prédictif d'un algorithme pour détecter l'insuffisance rénale chronique sévère (DFGe <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, patient non-dialysé ou CKD G4-5ND) à partir des banques de données administratives de la province de Québec, avec le débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe) comme point de référence. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude de cohorte rétrospective réalisée à partir des dossiers médicaux et de données administratives. CADRE: Des cliniques médicales communautaires et de protection rénale de Montréal et des régions rurales périphériques. SUJETS: Les dossiers médicaux de patients avec au moins deux mesures de la créatinine sérique (en moins d'un an) entre le 1er septembre 2013 et le 30 juin 2015 ont été revus consécutivement, en reculant dans le temps. Les patients avec insuffisance rénale terminale et dialysés ont été exclus. L'étude a débuté en septembre 2013. MESURES: Le DFG a été estimé à l'aide de la formule CKD Epidemiological Collaboration (CKD-EPI) à partir du dossier médical de chaque patient. Nous avons développé différents algorithmes en utilisant trois banques de données administratives avec différentes combinaisons de facturations médicales (diagnostics et nombre de visites en néphrologie) et de données colligées au congé de l'hôpital dans les cinq ans précédant l'entrée dans la cohorte, de même qu'avec la consommation de certains médicaments et les interventions médicales subies en préparation à la dialyse dans les deux ans précédant l'entrée dans la cohorte. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les données des dossiers médicaux ont été utilisées pour définir le DFGe. La validité des algorithmes développés a été évaluée en utilisant la sensibilité, la spécificité, la valeur prédictive positive (VPP) et la valeur prédictive négative (VPN). RÉSULTATS: En tout, 434 dossiers médicaux ont été revus; l'âge moyen des patients était de 74.2 ± 10.6 ans et 83% avaient plus de 65 ans. La sensibilité de l'algorithme no.3 (diagnostic dans un délai de 2 à 5 ans et/ou l'usage de médicaments spécifiques dans un délai de 2 ans, et au moins quatre visites médicales en néphrologie dans les 2 à 5 ans précédant la date d'entrée dans la cohorte) dans l'identification d'une insuffisance rénale sévère (CKD G4-5ND) variait de 82.5% à 89.0%. La spécificité de ce même algorithme variait de 97.1% à 98.9% avec une PPV et une NPV allant respectivement de 94.5.% à 97.7% et de 91.1% à 94.2%. L'analyse de sous-groupes (patients diabétiques, hypertendus, âgés de moins de 65 ans ou âgés de 65 ans et plus) ainsi que la comparaison de la prévalence prédite dans une cohorte de patients âgés par rapport aux données de la littérature font valoir la précision de notre algorithme pour les patients avec insuffisance rénale sévère (CKD G4-5ND). LIMITES: Notre cohorte était composée essentiellement de sujets âgées, les résultats pourraient ne pas s'appliquer à tous les adultes. Les patients n'ayant pas eu deux mesures de la créatinine sérique à l'intérieur d'un an ont été exclus. CONCLUSION: Chez les personnes âgées, la définition de cas pour une insuffisance chronique rénale sévère (CKD G4-5ND) estimée par un algorithme utilisant les codes diagnostic, la consommation de médicaments spécifiques et les services médicaux de néphrologie tirés des données administratives s'avère un algorithme valide comparativement à l'examen du dossier médical.

Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017.

There is widespread concern that Russia and other countries have launched social-media campaigns designed to increase political divisions in the United States. Though a growing number of studies analyze the strategy of such campaigns, it is not yet known how these efforts shaped the political attitudes and behaviors of Americans. We study this question using longitudinal data that describe the attitudes and online behaviors of 1,239 Republican and Democratic Twitter users from late 2017 merged with nonpublic data about the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) from Twitter. Using Bayesian regression tree models, we find no evidence that interaction with IRA accounts substantially impacted 6 distinctive measures of political attitudes and behaviors over a 1-mo period. We also find that interaction with IRA accounts were most common among respondents with strong ideological homophily within their Twitter network, high interest in politics, and high frequency of Twitter usage. Together, these findings suggest that Russian trolls might have failed to sow discord because they mostly interacted with those who were already highly polarized. We conclude by discussing several important limitations of our study-especially our inability to determine whether IRA accounts influenced the 2016 presidential election-as well as its implications for future research on social media influence campaigns, political polarization, and computational social science.

Oral Anticoagulant Prescription Trends, Profile Use, and Determinants of Adherence in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data on oral anticoagulant (OAC) uptake and pattern of use are limited. Real-life data in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are important for understanding patient exposure. A cohort study of new OAC users was built to assess trends of drug use from 2011 to 2017, persistence rate, switching rate, adherence level, and predictors of adherence. METHODS: We built a cohort using the Régie d'Assurance Maladie du Québec (RAMQ) and Med-Echo administrative databases of new adult OAC users within 1 year following hospitalization with a diagnosis of AF. New users of OAC were defined as having no OAC claims in the year before cohort entry. We assessed trends of OAC use; persistence rate, defined as a gap between refills of no longer than two times the duration of the previous prescriptions; and adherence level, defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) over a 1-year period following initiation. Predictors of nonadherence (PDC less than 80%) were analyzed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 33,311 incident OAC users. Of total OAC claims, the proportions of warfarin claims decreased from 77.9% in 2011 to 12.7% in 2017, with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) accounting for 87.3% of claims, of which apixaban and rivaroxaban accounted for 60.1% and 23.4%, respectively, by the end of 2017. One year after OAC initiation, persistence rates ranged from 53% with warfarin to 77% with a high dose of apixaban. Approximately 75% of incident OAC users were considered "adherent" (PDC 80% or more), with a mean PDC of 95.6-98.1%, compared with "nonadherent," with a mean PDC varying between 43.1% and 50.7%. Older age, female sex, higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc score (to predict thromboembolic risk in AF), prior stroke, and treatment with chronic cardiovascular disease drugs were associated with high adherence levels. CONCLUSION: The clinical uptake of DOACs increased over time, accounting for 87.3% of prescriptions in 2017. In our study, 25% of new OAC users presented a low adherence level. Adherence to OACs remains a significant challenge in patients with AF.

Anticoagulants in Older Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation after Intracranial Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who survive an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) have an increased risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (IS/ SE). We investigated whether starting oral anticoagulants (OACs) among older NVAF patients after an ICH was associated with a lower risk of IS/SE and mortality but offset by an increase in major bleeding. METHODS: We assembled a patient cohort from the Quebec Régie de l'Assurance Maladie du Québec (RAMQ) and Med-Echo administrative databases. We identified older adults with NVAF from 1995 to 2015. All patients with incident ICH and discharged in community were included. Patients were categorized according to OAC exposure. Outcomes included IS/SE, all-cause mortality, recurrent ICH and major bleeding after a quarantine period of 6 weeks. Crude event rates were calculated at 1-year of follow-up, and Cox proportional hazard models with a time-dependent binary exposure were used to assess adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs). RESULTS: The cohort of 683 NVAF patients with ICH aged 83 years on average. The rates (per 100 person-years) for IS/SE, death, ICH and major bleeding were 3.3, 40.6, 11.4, and 2.7 for the no OAC group; and 2.6, 16.3, 5.2, and 5.2 for OAC group, respectively. The AHR for IS/SE and death was 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05 to 0.21), 0.43 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.97) for recurrent ICH and 1.73 (95% CI, 0.71 to 4.20) for major extracranial bleeding comparing OAC exposure to non-exposed. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating OAC after ICH in older individuals with NVAF is associated with a reduction of IS/SE and mortality and a trend in recurrent ICH supporting its use after ICH.

Inflammatory bowel disease patient perceptions of diagnostic and monitoring tests and procedures.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) with its high incidence and prevalence rates in Canada generates a heavy burden of tests and procedures. The purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of the transfer of information from physician to patient, as well as the patient understanding and perceptions about the tests and procedures that are ordered to them in the context of IBD diagnosis and monitoring. METHODS: An online questionnaire was completed by 210 IBD patients in Canada. Information on the five most-often used tests or procedures in IBD diagnosis/monitoring was collected. These include: general blood test, colonoscopy, colon biopsy, medical imaging and stool testing. RESULTS: The general blood test is both the most ordered and most refused tool. It is also the one with which patients are the least comfortable, the one that generates the least concern and the one about which physicians provide the least information. The stool test is the test/procedure with which patients are the most comfortable. Procedures raise more concerns among patients and physicians provide more information about why they are needed, their impact and the risks they present. Very little information is provided to patients about the risks of having false positives or negative tests. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an initial understanding of patient perceptions, the transfer of information from a physician to a patient and a patient's understanding of the tests and procedures that will be required to treat IBD throughout what is a lifelong disease. The present study takes a first step in better understanding the acceptance of the test or procedure by IBD patients, which is essential for them to adhere to the monitoring process.

Is there a potential association between spironolactone and the risk of new-onset diabetes in a cohort of older patients with heart failure?

PURPOSE: Some evidence suggests that spironolactone may have a deleterious effect on glucose homeostasis. The objective of this study was to assess whether spironolactone use is associated with a higher risk of developing diabetes in a large cohort of patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: Two Quebec government administrative databases were used to identify a cohort of hospitalized patients discharged between January 1995 and December 2009 with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF and without secondary discharge diagnosis of diabetes. Patients were categorized as new users of spironolactone and non-users. The primary outcome was defined as new-onset diabetes (NOD) during 5 years of follow-up and was ascertained using ICD codes for diabetes or use of hypoglycemic agents. RESULTS: Among the 2974 patients that were included in the cohort analysis, 769 were given a new prescription of spironolactone. The incidence rate of NOD was similar among spironolactone users (5.0 per 100 person-years) and non-users (4.9 per 100 person-years). There was no significant association between the use of spironolactone and NOD in the crude, unadjusted model (hazard ratio (HR) 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.28; p = 0.9217), and it remained unchanged in the adjusted Cox proportional hazard model (HR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.72-1.18; p = 0.5227). The results were consistent with those observed in sensitivity analyses of a 1:3 propensity score-matched cohort (HR = 0.97; CI = 0.76-1.25; p = 0.8169). CONCLUSION: We found no evidence supporting the claim that use of spironolactone is associated with a higher risk of diabetes among patients hospitalized for HF.

Development of Quality Indicators to Assess Oral Anticoagulant Management in Community Pharmacies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the quality of oral anticoagulant management by community pharmacists. There is no complete set of quality indicators available for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of specific quality indicators to assess oral anticoagulant management by community pharmacists for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Quality indicators were developed in 3 phases. In phase 1, potential quality indicators were generated based on clinical guidelines and a literature review. In phase 2, a modified RAND appropriateness method involving 2 rounds was implemented with 9 experts, who judged the appropriateness of quality indicators generated in phase 1 based on the extent to which they were accurate, based on evidence, relevant, representative of best practices, and measurable in community pharmacies. Phase 3 consisted of a feasibility assessment in 5 community pharmacies on 2 patients each. RESULTS: The final set included 38 quality indicators grouped into 6 categories: documentation (n = 29), risk assessment (n = 3), clinical control (n = 1), clinical follow-up (n = 15), choice of therapy (n = 11), and interaction management (n = 8). The quality indicators referred to process of care (n = 34), clinical outcomes (n = 2), or structure of care (n = 2). There were 24 quality indicators related to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and 17 were related to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). To assess quality indicators, a questionnaire was developed for completion by community pharmacists for each patient, which included 17 questions about VKA patients and 12 questions about DOAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: A first set of quality indicators is now available to assess the quality of oral anticoagulant management by community pharmacists for patients with AF. DISCLOSURES: This research was supported by the Réseau Québécois de recherche sur le médicament (RQRM); the Blueprint for Pharmacy in collaboration with Pfizer Canada; and the Cercle du Doyen of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal. The study sponsors were not involved in the study design, data collection, data interpretation, the writing of the article, or the decision to submit the report for publication. Chartrand received a scholarship from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec en Santé (FRQ-S), the Réseau Québécois de recherche sur l'usage des médicaments with Pfizer, and the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal. Guénette holds a Junior-1 Clinician Researcher Award from the FRQ-S in partnership with the Société québécoise d'hypertension artérielle. Williamson holds a Junior-1 Career Award from the FRQ-S. Côté reported being a medical speaker for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, and Pfizer Canada. The other authors reported no conflicts of interest. Study concept and design were contributed by Lalonde, Chartrand, and Martin. Chartrand, Martin, and Lalonde collected the data, along with Brouillette, Côté, Huot, Landry, Martineau, Perreault, Williamson, and White-Guay. Data interpretation was performed by Chartrand, Gagnon, and Lalonde, along with Guénette and Martin. The manuscript was primarily written by Chartrand, along with Guénette and Lalonde, and revised by Chartrand, Guénette, and Lalonde, along with the other authors. A portion of this study's results was presented at the 4th RQRM Annual Meeting on September 22-23, 2014, in Orford, Quebec, Canada, in the form of an abstract, which was published in the Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 2014;21(2):e312.

Patients' perception of their involvement in shared treatment decision making: Key factors in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to characterize the relationships between the quality of the information given by the physician, the involvement of the patient in shared decision making (SDM), and outcomes in terms of satisfaction and anxiety pertaining to the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A Web survey was conducted among 200 Canadian patients affected with IBD. The theoretical model of SDM was adjusted using path analysis. SAS software was used for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: The quality of the knowledge transfer between the physician and the patient is significantly associated with the components of SDM: information comprehension, patient involvement and decision certainty about the chosen treatment. In return, patient involvement in SDM is significantly associated with higher satisfaction and, as a result, lower anxiety as regards treatment selection. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the importance of involving patients in shared treatment decision making in the context of IBD. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Understanding shared decision making may motivate patients to be more active in understanding the relevant information for treatment selection, as it is related to their level of satisfaction, anxiety and adherence to treatment. This relationship should encourage physicians to promote shared decision making.

Association Between Metformin Adherence and All-Cause Mortality Among New Users of Metformin: A Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Metformin presents better survival rates than other oral antidiabetics in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, these benefits may be dampened by inadequate treatment adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the relationship between adherence level to metformin therapy and all-cause mortality over 10 years in incident metformin users. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted using a large cohort of beneficiaries of the Quebec public drug insurance plan, aged 45 to 85 years, who initiated metformin between 2000 and 2009. Each case of all-cause death during follow-up was matched with up to 10 controls. Adherence to metformin was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR). Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate rate ratios (RRs) for mortality between adherent (MPR ≥ 80%) and nonadherent patients (MPR < 80%). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to age (45-64 and 65-85 years) and comedication use (antihypertensive/cardiovascular drugs and statins). RESULTS: The cohort included 82 720 incident metformin users, followed up for 2.4 [0.8-4.4] years (median [interquartile range]) and 4747 cases of all-cause deaths. Analyses revealed decreased mortality risks after long-term adherence to metformin. Specifically, RRs were 0.84 (95% CI = [0.71-0.98]) and 0.69 [0.57-0.85] after 4 to 6 and ≥6 years of adherence to metformin, respectively. Survival benefits of long-term adherence (≥4 years) were also observed across most subgroups and particularly in patients using neither antihypertensive/cardiovascular drugs nor statins (0.57 [0.41-0.77]). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term adherence to metformin is associated with decreased risks of all-cause mortality in incident metformin users. Further research should investigate whether survival benefits vary according to the comorbidity burden of patients.

Exploring the Use of a Participative Design in the Early Development of a Predictive Test: The Importance of Physician Involvement.

In this study, we contribute to the personalized medicine and health care management literature by developing and testing a new participative design approach. We propose that involving gastroenterologists in the development of a predictive test to assist them in their clinical decision-making process for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases will increase the likelihood of their acceptance of the innovation. Based on data obtained from 6 focus groups across Canada from a total of 28 physicians, analyses reveal that current tools do not enable discriminating between treatment options to find the best fit for each patient. Physicians expect a new predictive tool to have the capability of showing clear reliability and significant benefits for the patient, while being accessible in a timely manner that facilitates clinical decisions. Physicians also insist on their key role in the implementation process, hence confirming the relevance and importance of participative designs in personalized medicine.

Older adults with heart failure treated with carvedilol, bisoprolol, or metoprolol tartrate: risk of mortality.

PURPOSE: The long-term use of ß-blockers has been shown to improve clinical outcomes among patients with heart failure (HF). However, a lack of data persists in assessing whether carvedilol or bisoprolol are superior to metoprolol tartrate in clinical practice. We endeavored to compare the effectiveness of ß-blockers among older adults following a primary hospital admission for HF. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using Quebec administrative databases to identify patients who were using ß-blockers, carvedilol, bisoprolol, or metoprolol tartrate after the diagnosis of HF. We characterized the patients by the type of ß-blocker prescribed at discharge of their first HF hospitalization. An adjusted multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the primary outcome of all-cause mortality. We also conducted analyses by matching for a propensity score for initiation of ß-blocker therapy and assessed the effect on primary outcome. RESULTS: Among 3197 patients with HF with a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the crude annual mortality rates (per 100 person-years) were at 16, 14.9, and 17.7 for metoprolol tartrate, carvedilol, and bisoprolol, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios of carvedilol (hazard ratio 0.92; 0.78-1.09) and bisoprolol (hazard ratio 1.04; 0.93-1.16) were not significantly different from that of metoprolol tartrate in improving survival. After matching for propensity score, carvedilol and bisoprolol showed no additional benefit with respect to all-cause mortality compared with metoprolol tartrate. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence suggests no differential effect of ß-blockers on all-cause mortality among older adults with HF. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Persistence and adherence to oral antidiabetics: a population-based cohort study.

AIMS: A population-based cohort study design was used to estimate persistence rate, re-initiation rate after discontinuation, and adherence level among incident users of oral antidiabetics (OADs), and to investigate predictors of non-persistence and non-adherence. METHODS: Incident OAD users were identified using healthcare databases of residents covered by the public drug insurance plan of the Province of Quebec, Canada. Patients initiated OAD therapy between January 2000 and October 2009 and were aged 45-85 years at cohort entry. Persistence rate, re-initiation after discontinuation, and adherence level were assessed over 2 years. Predictors of non-persistence and non-adherence were analyzed using Cox and logistic regression models, respectively. RESULTS: The cohort included 160,231 incident OAD users at entry. One year after OAD initiation, persistence rate was 51 % and adherence level 67 %. Among those deemed non-persistent, 80.6 % re-initiated OAD therapy within 12 months of discontinuation; a proportion increasing with primary persistence duration. The 1-year persistence rate varied according to OAD classes; being the highest for thiazolidinediones (62 %) and the lowest for alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (30 %). The likelihood for non-persistence was 39-54 % higher when drug copayments were required. Conversely, OAD discontinuation was least likely for patients with schizophrenia [hazard ratio 0.70 (95 % CI 0.67-0.73)], dyslipidemia [0.85 (0.84-0.87)], anticoagulation [0.86 (0.83-0.88)], hypertension [0.87 (0.85-0.88)], and ≥7 medications [0.90 (0.88-0.91)]. Predictors of non-adherence were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Non-persistence and non-adherence to OAD therapy were common, although re-initiation rate was high. OAD classes, drug copayments, comorbidities and co-medications may help identifying those who were more likely to benefit from counseling.

Adherence to antihypertensive agents improves risk reduction of end-stage renal disease.

Uncontrolled hypertension is associated with an increased risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Intensified blood pressure control may slow progression of chronic kidney disease; however, the impact of antihypertensive agent adherence on the prevention of ESRD has never been evaluated. Here we assessed the impact of antihypertensive agent adherence on the risk of ESRD in 185,476 patients in the RAMQ databases age 45 to 85 and newly diagnosed/treated for hypertension between 1999 and 2007. A case cohort study design was used to assess the risk of and multivariate Cox proportional models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio of ESRD. Adherence level was reported as a medication possession ratio. Mean patient age was 63 years, 42.2% male, 14.0% diabetic, 30.3% dyslipidemic, and mean follow-up was 5.1 years. A high adherence level of 80% or more to antihypertensive agent(s) compared to a lower one was related to a risk reduction of ESRD (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence intervals 0.54-0.83). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the effect is mainly in those without chronic kidney disease. Risk factors for ESRD were male, diabetes, peripheral artery disease, chronic heart failure, gout, previous chronic kidney disease, and use of more than one agent. Thus, our study suggests that a better adherence to antihypertensive agents is related to a risk reduction of ESRD and this adherence needs to be improved to optimize benefits.

Adherence to antihypertensive agents after ischemic stroke and risk of cardiovascular outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between antihypertensive (AH) drug adherence and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes among patients with a recent ischemic stroke and assess the validity of our approach. METHODS: A cohort of 14,227 patients diagnosed with an ischemic stroke was assembled from individuals 65 years and older who were treated with AH agents from 1999 to 2007 in Quebec, Canada. A nested case-control design was used to evaluate the occurrence of nonfatal major CV outcomes and mortality. Each case was matched to 15 controls by age and cohort entry time. Medication possession ratio was used for AH agent adherence level. Adjusted conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the rate ratio of CV events. The validity of the approach was assessed by evaluating the adherence level of CV-protective and non-CV-protective drugs. RESULTS: Mean age was 75 years, 54% were male, 38% had coronary artery disease, 23% had diabetes, 47% dyslipidemia, and 14% atrial fibrillation or flutter. High adherence to AH therapy was mirrored by similar adherence to statins and antiplatelet agents and was associated with a lower risk of nonfatal vascular events compared with lower adherence (rate ratio 0.77 [0.70-0.86]). We observed a paradoxic link between adherence to several drugs and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Adherence to AH agents is associated with adherence to other secondary preventive therapies and a risk reduction for nonfatal vascular events after an ischemic stroke. Overestimation of all-cause mortality reduction may be related to frailty and comorbidities, which may confound the apparent benefit of different drugs.